Guest Co-Editing, Admin Assist and an AI Chart Builder

AwardScience, award and grant management software, released guest co-editing without an account, Admin Assist mode and an AI chart builder in the week of 10 August 2026. The single most common reason a collaborator never contributes to an application is being asked to create an account at the moment they were trying to help. This week removed that step, and then dealt with the three things that go wrong once you have.

On this page

Share an application with anyone with the link, or restrict it to named people. Guests sign in once and edit alongside the team, with no account creation by an administrator. Links can be sent by email, WhatsApp, LinkedIn, X or Facebook, and regenerated to revoke the old one.

A note for programme administrators: open sharing means applicant data reaches people the programme never registered. If your collection statement names who may see a submission, guest collaborators belong in that description. The restricted list exists for programmes that need collaboration bounded to named individuals.

app.awardscience.com/main/application/1042
Share link

Control who can open this link and how it is shared.

Anyone with the link

Anyone with this link can open and co-edit the application.

People with access
dana@partner.org ✕li.wei@partner.org ✕
name@example.comAdd
Link
app.awardscience.com/s/7fK2q…Copied
Share via · Email · WhatsApp · LinkedIn · X · Facebook
RegenerateSave link

Share link dialog

For IT teams. Per-link guest identity used by REST and real-time sessions alike. Guests are authenticated for load, edit and submit.

Admin Assist mode

Support staff can step into a user’s account to help them complete an application, then exit. A banner is visible the entire time, everything done is recorded as assisted rather than as the user, and sensitive actions — password, email, account deletion, payment — are blocked while assisting.

The blocked actions are what make this acceptable to a compliance reviewer. “Support can log in as any applicant” is a finding. “Support can complete form fields under an audited assist session and cannot touch credentials or money” is a control.

app.awardscience.com/admin/contact_management
NameContactAccount TypeStatusAction
Maria Ortizm.ortiz@example.orgResearcherActive🛟 ⇥ Assist this user
Admin consoleExit assist

You are working inside this user’s account on their behalf. Everything you do is recorded as that user.

Not available while assisting
This action cannot be performed while assisting another user.

Contacts › Assist this user, and the header banner while assisting

For IT teams. Dedicated assist session with audited enter and exit. Blocked actions return an explicit message rather than failing quietly.

AI chart builder and Analyse with AI

Ask the assistant for a chart and it builds it from your own programme data. If the chart cannot be drawn as asked, it offers to fix it and asks before spending the extra credit. On any page with charts, Analyse with AI writes an insight across all of them at once.

Asking before spending is the detail that took the longest to get right. An assistant that silently retries four times is an assistant that produces a bill nobody authorised.

app.awardscience.com/admin/form-builder
AI Assistant
Clear

Edit your form with AI

Hello, how can I help you today?
Add a bar chart of submissions per region, split by status
The chart couldn’t be built as-is. Fix it automatically? This uses 1 more AI request from your balance.
ConfirmDismiss
Ask the assistant…Send
AI Analysis
Analyse chartsAsk AI

Analysing 4 charts on this page

Submissions from APAC rose 38% on last season, driven by early-career applicants. Approval rates are steady across regions except EMEA, where 9 applications are still in review.

Form builder › AI Assistant with chart repair offer

For IT teams. The assistant reads a metadata-only catalogue of your data, never the rows. Repair attempts are capped and count against the AI quota.

Co-editing now covers files, images and tables

Uploaded files, images and table rows sync live as well, including across browser tabs. While a teammate is changing a file or a table row, it is framed in their colour.

Tables were the awkward case: a table is locked as a single field while someone edits it, because row-level locking inside a table produces a coordination problem rather than solving one.

app.awardscience.com/main/application/1042
Supporting documents
JS
Choose File(s)Accepted files: PDF, DOCX, XLSX
📄 budget-2026.xlsxDownload
📄 cv-jordan-sato.pdfDownload
Team members
NameRoleInstitution
Alex LimLeadHarbour University
Jordan SatoCo-investigatorNorthwind Lab
A collaborator updated this image.

Application form › file field being edited by a teammate

For IT teams. A table is locked as one field while edited. Existing files remain downloadable throughout.

No more double charges

If two teammates try to pay for the same application, or one person clicks Pay twice, exactly one payment goes through. The second person gets a clear message instead of a second charge.

Duplicate charges are rare, and every single one generates a refund, an apology and a reduced chance that the applicant recommends your programme to anyone.

app.awardscience.com/main/application/1042
Application fee
Community Grant 2026 · submission feeUSD 50.00
Pay now
Someone else is already paying for this application. Please try again once they have finished or cancelled.
POST /api/v1/users/stripe/checkout-session/:formId/:stage
→ 409 { "error": "payment_in_progress" }

Application payment step with the duplicate-payment message

For IT teams. Per-application, per-stage payment claim held for 30 minutes and backed by a unique index, plus Stripe idempotency keys. Returns 409 payment_in_progress or payment_already_completed.

Also in this release

Column-mapping checks now show sample failing rows for imports, the WhatsApp inbox had a run of fixes, and the Android build was cleaned up.

Availability

Everything above shipped in the week of 10 August 2026 and is live now. Features marked Pro or Enterprise are noted as such in their technical notes; everything else is available on every plan.

If you are comparing platforms, these are reasonable things to test in a trial rather than take on trust — alongside the questions in our RFP guide.


Book a live demo to see any of this on your own programme, or review pricing.

Leave a Comment

Scroll to Top

Discover more from AwardScience | Data-Driven Award & Grant Management Software

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading